August 11th, 2007

This individual (Loohan) and his information has been coming up on the site lately. He has offered his opinion about me which is immaterial and made comments on some of this information, which is important.

I don't feel it's necessary to challenge everyone if they have information that is different than what I hear, but on his website, he writes about some very fine reptilians and renegade Pleiadians. Now there was no audio about renegade Pleiadians, but there was a fair amount about these charming reptilians and that is important enough for me to take the time to challenge.

The Loohan audio was a 28-minute discourse starting with the Gnostic's version of creation. He is not necessarily putting this forth as his beliefs at first and is going over the creation story. After a point, he does give his opinions on this story. So to reverse is a bit tricky because there is a whole lot of information coming forth and then also some of his own information, which I believe he mostly gleaned from dowsing as he mentions dowsing a number of times.
He does say some things that I felt were very questionable and usually he refutes these statements in reverse.

In this first clip he is talking about the Gnostic version of the beginning of creation and how some beings called aeons were formed.

Forward: 'When he is spelling aeons in forward'
Reverse: 'A net, what he gets'

This whole mythic story seems to be filled with faulty information. So I skipped to the bad reptilian, good reptilian story.
Reverse: 'It's an alias, bad results'
Reverse: 'Got hero for the owl'.
Reverse: 'He'll imagine now, development' (This is the point where he makes the statement about genetic engineering to make the good reptilians).
Reverse: 'We believe dreams, it's an alias'

There is a lot of information being brought out as if it were fact. One has to question everything in reverse to figure out what is correct and what is wrong.

In part of the creation story Loohan is saying (in reverse):
'Must end the verse, because (it's) bad'

In that clip he uses the common metaphor, skit two times:
Reverse: 'This bad skit'
Reverse: 'Master of skits'.

Now he's making a broad statement (in reverse): 'You're fibbing'